Question Details

[solution] » Please take a look at the ATTACHED guidelines and rubric

Brief item decscription

Step-by-step solution file

Item details:

Please take a look at the ATTACHED guidelines and rubric

Please take a look at the ATTACHED guidelines and rubric carefully.

Reaction Paper Guidelines and Rubric


Each reaction will be based off of one of the podcasts or videos listed below.


Your paper must be typed, single-spaced, one to two pages in length, one-inch margins, and written in 12-point


font (Times New Roman or something similar).


Your paper should demonstrate that you have 1) understood the material and, 2) made connections between the


podcast and other class material (such as the textbook or class lectures).


The primary goal of these papers is to encourage you to think deeply about the assigned materials. Your papers


should not consist of a list of scattered thoughts. Your paper should be an organized summary of your reaction to


the material.


In order to receive full points, be sure to follow the instructions below carefully.


Assignment Details: Please read BEFORE you listen to the podcast. 1. Prior to listening to the podcast, on a piece of paper, jot down a few things you already know about the


topic the podcast is about. 2. Next, listen to the podcast and make notes about the topics that are addressed on your piece of paper.


Once the podcast is finished, you should be able to summarize the podcast based off of your notes. 3. While listening to the podcast, make notes about your reaction(s) to the program. If you feel ?stuck? and


don?t know how to evaluate your reactions, consider the following questions:


o Did the program change your understanding of the topic? If so, what


changed? o Did the program provoke new questions about the topic? What are these


questions? o Was the information presented in the program consistent (or inconsistent)


with your understanding of the topic? What was the most surprising thing you


learned? o How can the information from the program be applied to your own life? o (You DO NOT have to answer all of these questions?they are provided as prompts to aid you in


the writing process.) 4. Find information in the book or in one of the class lectures that relates to the material in the podcast or


video. This information can either support or challenge the information presented in the podcast. 5. Write your reaction paper. Your reaction paper should consist of:


o one to two paragraphs that summarize your thoughts about the topic prior to listening to the


program. o one to two paragraphs that describe the topics addressed in the program from beginning, middle,


and end (this serves as proof that you actually listened to the whole program). o At least two paragraphs that relate the information to class material (either lectures or the book).


Cite the book pages and lectures referenced (does NOT have to be in APA format) o two to three paragraphs that convey your reaction to the program. You can structure the ?reaction? part of your paper any way you like, and can focus on whatever is interesting to you. However, you should NOT present simply a list of scattered thoughts. Clarity and organization are important. Additionally, your reaction should be about the content of the podcast, rather than irrelevant details (ex. speaking style, length, sound, etc.). Social Psychology ? Fall 2016 1 Reaction paper due dates are listed on the syllabus. Reaction papers can be completed anytime throughout the


semester as long as it?s before the due date. In other words, you could complete both reaction papers within the


first week of class if you felt ambitious. Because this is an online course, you will have to wait until the week the reaction paper is due to submit it.


Reaction papers will be worth 50 points. They will be graded using this grading rubric:


Previous knowledge and understanding · Writes at least 1 paragraph discussing previous understanding of the podcast topic 10 pts Summary · Writes 1 to 2 paragraphs summarizing the podcast or video · Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the material · Makes it clear that the writer listened to the beginning, middle, and end of the podcast or


video 10 pts Relation to book or lecture material · At least 2 paragraphs linking the podcast or video information back to book or lecture mate- 10 pts


rial · Cites the book or lecture material they referenced (does not have to be in APA format) Reaction · Writes 1 to 2 paragraphs discussing reaction to the podcast or video · Reactions are about podcast or video content, rather than speaking style, podcast length, or


other extraneous details 10 pts Grammar and writing ability · Paper is coherent and easy to read · Paper reads smoothly with appropriate transitions between ideas · Paper could be understood by someone who has never taken a social psychology course or


who is unfamiliar with the topics discussed · Writing is clear without vagueness or ambiguity · Writing holds the reader?s attention · Avoids hyperbolic statements · Writing is free of spelling or mechanics errors 10 pts Listed below are the different podcasts you can use to complete this assignment. You are allowed to choose any


podcast you are most interested in to complete each reaction paper, however, you must choose DIFFERENT podcasts for each of the paper assignments.


If you have taken one of my other classes (ex. evolutionary psychology or human sexuality), you might notice that


some of the video options below were also used in that class. Social psychology is so closely related to every other


field in psychology, that there is a lot of overlap. If you have already completed a paper on one of the options be- Social Psychology ? Fall 2016 2 low for one of my other classes, please do not reuse that paper for this class. Doing so will result in a failing grade


on that paper. Choose another podcast option to complete your current paper.


Make sure to clearly label your paper with the title of the podcast or video you are writing about.


If you have any questions, please don?t hesitate to ask! Option 1: Amy Webb: How I hacked online dating


· This video features a woman who statistically figured out how to make an online dating website


provide her with suitable dating partners. Option 3: Paul Bloom: Can prejudice ever be a good thing?


· This video discusses some of the ways prejudice is an effective thinking strategy (thinking heuristic) and when prejudice has negative consequences (racism, sexism, etc.). It also discusses some


ways in which we can reduce the negative consequences of prejudice. Option 4: Paul Piff: Does money make you mean?


· This video talks about behavioral and attitudinal differences of the wealthy and the poor. It also


touches on ways we can combat these differences. Option 5: Emily Balcetis: Why some people find exercise harder than others


· This video discusses the perceptual differences between people who are highly motivated to exercise and those who are not. A simple way to make exercise seem easier is explored. Option 6: Jeremy Rifkin: The empathic civilization


· This video discusses mirror neurons, the psychological development of empathy, the evolutionary history of empathy, and possible future directions of empathy. Option 7: Amy Cuddy: Your body language shapes who you are


· This video discusses how our body language impacts others? perceptions of us and how our body


language affects our perception of ourselves. Cuddy explains a simple behavioral strategy that


can be used to improve nonverbal body language before evaluatory situations (ex. interviews). Option 8: David Pizarro: The strange politics of disgust


Social Psychology ? Fall 2016 3 · This video explores the emotion of disgust and how that emotion has been applied to groups of


people. Pizarro also discusses the relationship between a person?s ease of becoming disgusted


and their political affiliation. Option 9: Rory Sutherland: Life lessons from an ad man


· This video talks about how our assessment of value has more to do with our perception and less


to do with the object?s actual value. Option 10: Ziauddin Yousafzai: My daughter, Malala


· This video features Malala Yousafzai?s father. He discusses the negative consequences of a patriarchal society and some of Malala?s experiences which led her to become the youngest ever Nobel Prize laureate. Social Psychology ? Fall 2016 4


About this question:

This question was answered on: Feb 21, 2020

PRICE: $24 (18.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $24

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card. All your purchases are securely protected by PayPal.

Need a similar solution fast, written anew from scratch? Place your own custom order

We have top-notch tutors who can help you with your essay at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments. This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student. New solution orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.

Order Now