Question Details

[solution] » System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1

Brief item decscription

Step-by-step solution file


Item details:

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1
More:

Hi

can you answer the attach questions in attach file?


System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

Student ID No.

 


 

Family Name(s):

 

Forename(s):

 

Declaration:

 


 

I / We declare that this Coursework is my / our own work. Cheating is a serious academic

 

offence. I / We have read and agree to abide by the University guidance on Academic Honesty.

 

I / We consent to appropriate storage of our work for plagiarism checking.

 


 

Signature(s):

 

Time taken to complete assignment (hrs):

 

Module Title: Systems Development and Procurement

 


 

Assignment Title: Individual assignment

 


 

Lecturer: Mr. Puttaswamy

 

Assignment Type: Individual

 


 

th

 


 

Hand-out Date: 25 July 2016,

 

Estimated Time (hrs): 32

 


 

th

 


 

Work proposal submission date: 11 August 2016, 11:59pm

 

th

 


 

Date of Submission: 8 September 2016, 11:59 pm

 

Learning Outcomes Assessed (or on separate sheet)

 

As on assignment

 

Assessment Criteria (or on separate sheet)

 


 

Max

 


 

Awarded

 


 

100

 

1.

 


 

Individual topic paper

 


 

Comments

 


 

Total

 

Penalty

 


 

Assessor?s signature:

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Date:

 


 

Final Mark

 


 

Page 1

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

Individual Assignment-Summer 2016

 

Systems Development and Procurement (ECM39IS)

 

Work proposal submission date: 11th August 2016, 11:59pm

 

Submission Date: 8th September 2016, 11:59pm

 

Total Marks: 100

 

Introduction

 

This is an individual assignment aimed to give the student exposure to the concepts and

 

principles underpinning Information Systems Development and their application to a realistic

 

scenario.

 

Background of the assignment

 

This individual assignment is an opportunity for student to analyze the requirements,

 

evaluate methodologies and tools and to apply the chosen methods and tools to design a

 

software system for a realistic scenario provided. This assignment requires the compilation

 

and presentation of the findings/discussion in the format of a report inclusive of design

 

diagrams? well edited, attractive, and professionally laid out and academically sound.

 

Outcomes of the assignment

 

1. Discussion of various approaches/methodologies used in the development of information

 

systems and proposing an appropriate one for realistic scenario.

 

2. Critical evaluation of alternative options for requirement capturing.

 

3. Apply an effective user/system requirement capturing technique.

 

4. Proposal for the tools and techniques for the design, and development of information

 

system with respect to the scenario provided.

 

5. Design and develop static and dynamic models with the usage of appropriate tools

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 2

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

The System Development for Qurum Natural Park

 

I.

 


 

Background

 


 

A Qurum Natural Park is going to be established. The Qurum Natural Park will consist of many

 

different amusement facilities located in different area zones. In order to track and monitor

 

the customers? choices in playing facilities, each customer will be given a ticket containing a

 

RFID tag before entering the park. The tickets can be read by the sensors deployed at the

 

entrance and exits of each facility.

 

The manager in charge desires to set up an advanced PMS (Player Monitoring System) to

 

record and process the information sent from each tickets, aiming to provide better customer

 

service. The registration work is done by the ticket sellers at the box and the hardware

 

production and deployment has already been finished. So only the software-related analysis

 

of PMS is left to you.

 

II.

 


 

User Requirement

 


 

The manager has given the following user requirements:

 

1. Before playing a facility, the players must first place the tickets on the sensors set at

 

the entrance of the facility. The PMS will record the entry. Then they are free to enjoy

 

the excitement brought by the facility. Upon leaving, the user needs to present the

 

ticket again on the sensors at the exit of the facility. An exit record will be saved by

 

PMS.

 

2. If the number of players in the area of a facility has exceeded the threshold number

 

that a facility can hold, PMS will issue a warning message on the Desktop PC screen of

 

the manager in charge when the customers tab their tickets.

 

3. At 10 P.M. of each day on the screen of the computer the manager works on, PMS will

 

remind the manager of generating the daily report on usage frequency of each

 

facility? The manager then asks PMS to sort out ten least popular facilities and show it

 

on the screen. After the manager?s confirmation, PMS will generate the report

 

including each total entrance number of each facility visited by the customers from 9

 

A.M. to 5 P.M. on that day. In the end the manager saves the report to file.

 

4. At 10 P.M. on every 15th of each month, PSM will automatically produce a monthly

 

report of customer list that includes the names and phone numbers of ten randomly

 

chosen customers who have paid a visit to the Qurum Natural Park in the latest

 

month, so that the manager could further contact them in the future. The report will

 

be sent to the manager by email then.

 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 3

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

Assignment tasks

 

Task 1

 

Submit a work proposal for this assignment by the end of week 3rd i.e. 11th of August, 2016

 

(11:55 pm) which must include;

 

Expected Deliverables of the assignment [The deliverables are the specific work

 

products that student must produce in order to complete the assignment. Example:

 

For a business analysis assignment, deliverables could be business analysis plan,

 

feasibility report, business requirement specification etc.]

 

Approach towards the solution [Specify the Literature, Software and Hardware

 

needed to meet the assignment objectives]

 

Potential risks foreseeable [Technical risk, Management risk, External risk etc.]

 

Timeline and work breakdown (Gantt chart):

 

References

 

(10 marks)

 

Task 2

 

Compare and Contrast any two well proven methodologies used for information systems

 

development belonging to the categories of Iterative and Agile. You are required to propose

 

an appropriate situation/requirement suits to implement your selected methodologies within

 

the context of the given scenario. Your discussion points/ findings should be furnished as a

 

write up with 300 words of your own apart from the referred contents.

 

(15 Marks)

 

Task 3

 

Critically evaluate the various options available for requirement capturing within the context

 

of an information system development project. List down various functional and nonfunctional requirements of the scenario given.

 

(15 Marks)

 

Task 4

 

Perform a use case analysis for the scenario provided. You are required to produce an

 

appropriate Use Case Diagram of the whole system with all the use case relationship along

 

with Use Case Specification for the Use Cases identified.

 

(15 Marks)

 

Task 5

 

Produce a proposal for the tools and techniques for the design, and development of an

 

information system for the scenario provided. Your proposal should have the

 

recommendation of an appropriate development methodology, modeling technique,

 

modeling and development tool. Your recommendations should be justified with adequate

 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 4

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

supporting points. Your proposal should be furnished as a write up with 200 words of your

 

own apart from the referred contents.

 

(10 Marks)

 

Task 6

 

Design a class diagram for developing an information System for the scenario provided. Your

 

class diagram should produce a static architectural view of the proposed information system

 

for the scenario. You are required to provide appropriate role names and multiplicities for the

 

relationships in the class diagram.

 

(15 Marks)

 

Task 7

 

Critically evaluate your proposal and your design as prepared by you for task 5 and 6 prepare

 

a report of critical evaluation mentioning relevant aspects with improvement.

 

(10 Marks)

 

Task 8

 

Be ready for a presentation with your teacher to demonstrate your knowledge with concepts

 

incorporated on the assignment.

 

(10 Marks)

 

Note: Task 8 is compulsory. No marks will be awarded to tasks 1-7 without presentation.

 

Guidelines

 

Follow the guidelines mentioned below for your assignment.

 

Assignment should be typed and an electronic copy is to be submitted through

 

moodle

 

Handwritten assignments will not be accepted

 

The assignment should not be more than 20 pages in (size A4) paper. Minimum

 

acceptable size is 6 pages.

 

Assignment should have Complete and sign the cover sheet with the following

 

information

 

Assignment Name

 

Class

 

Student name

 

Student ID

 

It should have Table of Contents

 

Use page numbers

 

Assignment should be typed in your own words using Times New Roman font

 

size 12.

 

Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Underline

 

Use Diagrams and Examples to explain your topic, provided citation, if

 

applicable.

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 5

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

You are encouraged to refer the books in Library or use internet resource or

 

computer magazines or any other resource but you should not cut/copy and

 

paste from internet. The report should be in your own words.

 

Copy paste from the Internet is strictly not acceptable.

 

Reference should be included in the last page as follows

 

Author name, Book Title, Publisher, Year in case of books

 

In case of web site references type the full path of the web page with

 

referenced date

 

In case of magazines/ periodicals type article name, magazine name,

 

Issue Number and date

 

Regulations

 


 


 

Work submitted up to 1 week (5 working days) after the due date for submission will lose

 

10% of the mark (after internal moderation).

 


 


 


 

Work submitted after this, but up to 2 weeks (10 working days) late will lose 20% of the

 

overall mark.

 


 


 


 

Work tendered for submission more than 2 weeks (10 working days) after the due date

 

will not be accepted and an absence will be recorded for the assessment concerned. This

 

will count as a failed attempt and may result in you failing the module overall.

 


 

Plagiarism policy

 

As per MEC policy, any form of violation of academic integrity will invite severe penalty.

 

Plagiarized documents, in part or in whole, submitted by the students will be subject to this

 

policy.

 

A. First offence of plagiarism

 

a.

 


 

A student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period

 

of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the

 

resubmitted work will be imposed.

 


 

b.

 


 

Mark deduction: When the work is resubmitted, the marking will be undertaken

 

according to the marking criteria. In compliance with this policy, the 25% deduction is

 

then made on the marks obtained. For example, in an assessment that carries a

 

maximum of 50 marks, suppose a student were to obtain 30 marks for the

 

resubmitted work, the final marks for that assessment will be 22.5 (after deducting

 

25% of the marks actually obtained for the resubmitted work).

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 6

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

c.

 


 

Period of resubmission: The student will have to resubmit the work one week from

 

the date he or she is advised to resubmit. For example, if the formal advice to

 

resubmit was communicated to the student on a Sunday (latest by 5 pm), the student

 

will have to resubmit the work latest by next Sunday 5 pm.

 


 

d.

 


 

If the re-submitted work is also detected to be plagiarized, then the work will be

 

awarded a zero.

 


 

e.

 


 

Resubmission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be

 

accepted and the work will be awarded a zero.

 


 

B. Any further offence of plagiarism

 


 

a.

 


 

If any student is again caught in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study

 

(either in the same module, same semester or in any other semester), the student will

 

directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases,

 

the student will not be allowed to re-submit the work.

 


 

C. Guidelines

 

a.

 


 

Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted

 

at different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be

 

applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part

 

submission alone needs to be resubmitted.

 


 

b.

 


 

Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group

 

will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether

 

plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will

 

then be applied to all students.

 


 

c.

 


 

Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any

 

component or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment

 

(assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment

 

(assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be

 

resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an

 

act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 7

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the

 

group.

 

d.

 


 

Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of

 

components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g.

 

group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual

 

reflection), the following will be applicable:

 

1. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the

 

group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of

 

whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member.

 

The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. In such cases the group

 

assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy.

 

2. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual

 

assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. The policy will then

 

be applied to that student alone.

 

3. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the

 

whole assessment (assignment).

 


 

D. Amount of similar material

 

a.

 


 

The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from all sources put

 

together should not exceed 30% (including direct quotations).

 


 

b.

 


 

The total amount of quoted material (direct quotations) in any form of student work

 

from all sources put together should not exceed 10%.

 


 

c.

 


 

The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from a single source

 

should not exceed 7 percent. However, cases having a similarity of less than 7 percent

 

in such cases may still be investigated by the faculty depending on the seriousness of

 

the case.

 


 

d.

 


 

If faculty member find enough merit in the case of a student work with a similarity

 

(with a single source) of more than 7 percent as not a case of plagiarism, the faculty

 

member should provide detailed comments/remarks to justify the case.

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 8

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

Systems Development and Procurement

 

SUMMER 2016

 

Student Id: ______________

 


 

Student Name:_______________________________

 

Assignment Evaluation Grid

 


 

Deliverables

 

Task 1

 


 

Aspects

 

Work

 

Proposal

 

submission

 


 

Deliverables

 

Task 2

 


 

Aspects

 

Methodology

 

Comparison

 


 

0

 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 

0

 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 


 

1-6

 

Satisfactory attempt, some of the components are missing

 


 

7-10

 

Perfect work proposal

 

with all the

 

components

 


 

Marks

 


 

1-7

 

Identification of two correct

 

methodologies and comparison

 

made with minimal points.

 


 

8-10

 

Satisfactory level of

 

comparison among

 

identified

 

methodologies with

 

situations.

 

5-10

 


 

11-15

 

Complete and Perfect

 

Comparison among

 

methodologies

 

methodologies with

 

perfect situations

 

11-15

 


 

Marks

 


 

Satisfactory Level of

 

evaluation on various

 

options available for

 

requirement Capturing

 

along with suggested

 

techniques for the

 

situation.

 

5-10

 


 

Complete and an

 

accurate requirement

 

capturing techniques

 

with perfect

 

justifications and the

 

list of requirements

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

Aspects

 


 

0

 


 

1-4

 


 

Task 3

 


 

Selection of

 

appropriate

 

requirement

 

capturing

 

technique

 


 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 


 

evaluation on various options

 

available for requirement Capturing

 


 

Aspects

 


 

0

 


 

1-4

 


 

Use Case

 

Analysis

 


 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 


 

Good attempt/ Identification of

 

correct use cases and actors

 


 

Satisfactory Use Case

 

diagram and

 

Specifications.

 


 

Complete and

 

Perfect Use Case

 

diagram and

 

Specifications.

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

Aspects

 


 

0

 


 

1-4

 


 

5-7

 


 

8-10

 


 

Task 5

 


 

Proposal on

 

tools and

 

techniques

 


 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 


 

Identification of an appropriate

 

methodology, modeling and

 

development tool with minimum

 

justification.

 


 

Recommendation of

 

an appropriate

 

methodology,

 

modeling and

 

development tool with

 

satisfactory

 

justification.

 


 

Recommendation of

 

an appropriate

 

methodology,

 

modeling and

 

development tool with

 

complete justification.

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

Aspects

 


 

0

 


 

1-5

 


 

6-10

 


 

11-15

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

11-15

 


 

Marks

 


 

Marks

 


 

Task 4

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 9

 


 

Marks

 


 

Marks

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 

Task 6

 


 

Class diagram

 


 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 


 

Good attempt. Correct symbol

 

and model as per the use cases.

 


 

Satisfactory model as

 

per the use cases.

 


 

Perfect model with

 

regards to the use

 

cases identified

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

Aspects

 


 

0

 


 

1-4

 


 

5-7

 


 

8-10

 


 

Task 7

 


 

Critical

 

Evaluation

 


 

Evaluation on various points options

 

available for proposal and design

 


 

Satisfactory evaluation

 


 

Complete and perfect

 

evaluation

 


 

Deliverables

 


 

Aspects

 


 

Weak/Plagiarized

 

content/ No

 

report/No

 

Presentation

 

0

 


 

Task 8

 


 

Presentation

 


 

No Presentation

 


 

1-10

 


 

Marks

 


 

Marks are allocated as per the presentation evaluation grid

 


 

Signature of evaluator:

 

Total Marks

 

Penalty

 

Final Marks

 

Presentation Evaluation Grid (Task 8)

 

Evaluation Criteria

 

Correctness of explanation or

 

response to the questions

 


 

Range of Marks

 

0-5

 


 

Presentation Content, slide

 

Show

 


 

0-3

 


 

Presentation Skill

 


 

0-2

 


 

Marks

 


 

Total

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 10

 


 

System Development and Procurement-ECM39IS-SUMM-16-CW1 (ASSMNT)-QP

 


 

Systems Development and Procurement

 

Summer 2016

 

Student Id______________ Student Name:_______________________________

 


 

Presentation Evaluation Grid (Task 8)

 

Evaluation Criteria

 

Correctness of explanation or

 

response to the questions

 


 

Range of Marks

 

0-5

 


 

Presentation Content, slide

 

Show

 


 

0-3

 


 

Presentation Skill

 


 

0-2

 


 

Marks

 


 

Total

 


 

Comments:

 


 

Name and Signature of evaluator/moderator:

 


 

System Development and Procurement ECM39IS

 


 

Page 11

 


 

 







About this question:
STATUS
Answered
QUALITY
Approved
ANSWER RATING

This question was answered on: Feb 21, 2020

PRICE: $24

Solution~000452097.zip (18.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $24

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card. All your purchases are securely protected by PayPal.
SiteLock

Need a similar solution fast, written anew from scratch? Place your own custom order

We have top-notch tutors who can help you with your essay at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments. This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student. New solution orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.

Order Now